Who this is for
Six people usually touch the same export, and each of them wants a different report out of it. These are the six, in their own terms.
01 · Owns the program and the annual antibiogram
The annual report is yours, and so is every follow-up question about it. The work that disappears is the assembly: the export, the de-duplication in a spreadsheet, the pivot, the reformat, and doing it again for the intensive care unit.
02 · Owns the export and the data quality
You are the person who knows what the fields mean, which is why bad antibiograms are usually your problem to explain. Visible rules mean the argument about the number happens in the open, against a receipt, rather than in somebody else's spreadsheet.
03 · Watches the organisms, not the percentages
For a rare phenotype the count is the story and the percentage is noise. The MDRO view reports counts by unit and by quarter, which is the shape of the question you are actually asked in a meeting.
04 · Consumes the antibiogram and wants it current
You want it by syndrome and by unit, not by organism alone, and you want to know how old it is. Coverage ranking answers the question you actually ask: which agent covers the most of what we are seeing here.
05 · Signs the invoice and answers to the committee
The question is not disk diffusion. It is whether the program can evidence its tracking and reporting, what it costs in pharmacist hours, and whether the price can be found without a sales cycle.
06 · Needs clean, rule-consistent data
A dashboard is not the deliverable; a defensible dataset is. Running every site through identical rules is what makes a multi-site comparison a comparison rather than a collection of local reports.
For the decision maker
The replacement cost of this work is pharmacist hours: the report itself, plus the cuts that get requested and never answered. Put your own numbers in and the arithmetic is shown underneath, because a calculator that hides its formula is a sales prop.
Nothing here is a claim about clinical outcomes. We have no evidence that using this changes length of stay, mortality or antibiotic spend, so we do not say it does. What we can talk about honestly is time.
Compare it against the plans on the pricing page, where every limit is published.
Common cuts
Unit filter set to intensive care, full year. Expect lower susceptibility across most columns and more suppressed cells than the facility-wide report.
Source urine, unit outpatient. Usually the largest clean population in the file, and the one that drives the community guideline.
Source blood, full year. Fewer isolates, more suppression, and the report the sepsis pathway rests on.
The same cut in two periods with the rules held constant, which is the only comparison that means anything.
Counts rather than percentages, because a rare phenotype does not survive being turned into a rate.
The same rules across sites, on the Network plan, so a difference between hospitals is a real difference.
Start with your own export
Build the antibiogram on the synthetic sample dataset, or drop in your own CSV and watch it parse without leaving your browser. When you want an account, one email address is the whole sign-up.
Your file is parsed in your browser and never uploaded. No card required.